Representing Clients In DuPage County And Across Illinois

Balancing The Scales After
An Injury And Seeking
Justice For You

The Chicago Bar Association Foundation
Member Firm | ISBA
Rising Stars | Adam E. Schramm |
Super Lawyer Badge
  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Bankruptcy
  4.  » Chapter 7 Vs. Chapter 13

In This Section

Chapter 7 Vs. Chapter 13

If nonbankruptcy alternatives are not feasible, most consumer debtors must choose between a liquidation proceeding under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and a debt adjustment proceeding under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. A brief description of a Chapter 7 case is set forth in section 2.01, infra, and a brief description of a Chapter 13 case is set forth in section 3.01, infra. These sections should be consulted if the reader is unfamiliar with such proceedings.

The following factors should be considered in determining whether Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 is more appropriate for a consumer debtor:

(1) The dischargeability of debts. There are 18 classes of debts that are not dischargeable under Chapter 7 (see section 2.17, infra, for a list). Some types of debts that are nondischargeable under Chapter 7 may be dischargeable under Chapter 13 (see section 3.18, supra, for a list of debts that are not dischargeable under Chapter 13). If a person has substantial debts that are dischargeable under Chapter 13, but not under Chapter 7, Chapter 13 may be preferable to Chapter 7 for that person. A person’s eligibility for a discharge may also be a factor to consider. A person who has received a bankruptcy discharge in the past eight years is not eligible for a Chapter 7 discharge, but may be eligible for a Chapter 13 discharge, so Chapter 13 may be preferable for that person.

(2) Retaining secured property. A person who is in default on an important secured obligation such as a home mortgage or an automobile loan is usually permitted to cure the default within a reasonable period under Chapter 13 and thereby retain the secured property. The curing of defaults in secured obligations is not usually feasible in a Chapter 7 case. However, in a Chapter 7 case, the debtor is permitted to redeem or set aside liens against certain exempt personal property (see section 2.12, infra).

(3) Retaining nonexempt assets. In a Chapter 7 case, a debtor must turn all nonexempt property (or its cash equivalent) over to the trustee. In a Chapter 13 case, a debtor is usually permitted to retain his or her nonexempt property, provided that meaningful payments are made to unsecured creditors. Therefore, if a person has a large equity in his or her home or other important nonexempt assets, Chapter 13 may be preferable.

(4) Income. To qualify under Chapter 13, a debtor must have “regular income,” which is defined as income sufficiently stable and regular to enable a debtor to make payments under a Chapter 13 plan. If a person is unemployed or otherwise devoid of regular income, a Chapter 13 case may not be feasible. On the other hand, Chapter 7 may not be feasible for someone with sufficient income with which to pay $117.08 a month or more to unsecured creditors over a three- to five-year period because the Chapter 7 case of such a person is likely to be dismissed by the court as an abuse of Chapter 7 (see section 2.04, infra).

(5) Attitude toward debts. If a person has a sincere and realistic desire to repay all or most of his or her unsecured debts, Chapter 13 may be preferable. If a person wants to repay only one or two debts, the best practice may be to file under Chapter 7, if he or she qualifies under means testing, and later reaffirm the debts that the person wishes to repay. Finally, Chapter 7 is usually preferable for the qualified person who simply wishes to obtain a fresh financial start by discharging his or her debts as quickly and inexpensively as possible.

(6) Time and expense. Chapter 13 cases normally last from three to five years, with a discharge granted at the close of the case. Chapter 7 cases of typical consumer debtors last about six months, and a discharge is normally granted about four months after the case is filed. In Chapter 13 cases, the attorney’s fees and administration expenses tend to be considerably more than in Chapter 7 cases. If a person is not able or willing to make meaningful payments and otherwise comply with a Chapter 13 plan during the entire duration of the plan and to bear the additional expenses involved, Chapter 13 is probably not advisable for that person. Also, if anything is likely to occur during the duration of the case that would diminish or eliminate the person’s ability to make payments under a plan, then a Chapter 13 case may not be advisable.

Dog Bites
Slip & Fall/
Property Owner
Nursing Home
Motor Vehicle

Free Consultations